How To Upload Gif To Computer

It is very important that you read through the following options and questions, and provide all required information truthfully and carefully.

This is a complimentary piece of work.
I can demonstrate that information technology is legally okay for everyone to use, in Wikipedia and elsewhere, for any purpose.

Cheers for offering to upload a free work.

Wikipedia loves complimentary files. Withal, we would love it even more if you uploaded them on our sister project, the Wikimedia Commons. Files uploaded on Eatables can be used immediately here on Wikipedia equally well as on all its sister projects. Uploading files on Eatables works just the aforementioned as here. Your Wikipedia account will automatically piece of work on Commons too.

Please consider uploading your file on Commons.

However, if you adopt to practise it here instead, yous may go ahead with this form. You lot can also first use this form to collect the information about your file and then send it to Commons from hither.

This file is entirely my ain work.
I am the copyright holder. I made this myself, from scratch, without copying or incorporating anybody else'due south artistic work, and I am willing to release it nether a free license.

Please note that by "entirely self-made" we really mean just that.

Exercise not use this section for any of the following:

a browse or photograph you made of a painting, drawing, printed page or other item originally created by somebody else. The copyright belongs to the original creator, non to you lot.
a screenshot or other kind of capture of a video, computer screen, Television programme or other kind of visual media.
a picture you created past modifying or copying some other picture or past combining several preexisting pictures fabricated past somebody else.
a film given to y'all by somebody else.
a picture you constitute somewhere on the Internet.

Editors who falsely declare such items as their "ain work" will be blocked from editing.

Please describe how and when y'all created this item.
How?
	(e.k.: Where and on what kind of occasion did yous take this photograph? How did you brand this diagram? etc.)
Date
	(please use YYYY-MM-DD format if possible).
Publication:	Please signal here if you have previously published this item elsewhere, e.thou. on your ain website, your Flickr or Facebook account, etc., providing a link.
It is important that you lot identify this work under a free license, which volition permit everybody else to use it for whatever purpose, including both commercial and not-commercial purposes, and to modify it. This license will be irrevocable.

This file was given to me by its owner.
The copyright owner of this file has given it to me for uploading on Wikipedia. I tin can provide evidence that they have agreed to release it nether a free license, for costless employ past everyone and for any purpose.

Please describe who owns this work and how you got it from them.

Owner/author:

Date of
creation:

Source:

Where did you get the file from? (e.thousand. available online; was sent to me personally …)

Permission:

How did you receive the permission? (e.g.: by electronic mail, personally, I work for the possessor …)

The copyright possessor has chosen the post-obit license:

License:

Other:

Evidence:

	The license argument can be establish online at:
	The license agreement has been forwarded to Wikimedia'due south volunteer response team at "permissions-en@wikimedia.org". OTRS ticket received:
	The license hasn't yet been forwarded, but I will practise and so before long or ask the possessor to send information technology.
	I oasis't got the evidence right now, just I will provide some if requested to do so. Notation: files without verifiable permissions may exist deleted. You may be meliorate off obtaining proof of permission showtime.

This file is from a gratuitous published source.
I took it from a website or other published source, where its author has explicitly placed it nether a free license, allowing free re-apply by anybody.

Use this only if there is an explicit licensing statement in the source.

The website must explicitly say that the image is released under a license that allows free re-use for whatever purpose, due east.g. the Creative Commons Attribution license. You must be able to point exactly to where information technology says this.

If the source website doesn't say so explicitly, please do not upload the file.

Author/possessor:
Engagement of cosmos:
Source:	For web sources: please provide a link to the html spider web page where the file can be institute ("http://... .html"), not a direct link to the paradigm file itself ("http://... .jpg"). For print sources: provide full bibliographic information (author, title, publisher, year, page, etc.)
The copyright owner has called the following license for this file:
License:	Other:
Evidence:	Provide a link to where the writer explicitly says that the file is released under a free license. (if non visible on the source page itself).

This work is and then old its copyright has expired
This is an onetime photograph, or a photographic reproduction of an old painting, cartoon, etc. I can provide plenty information nearly its author and provenance to testify that it is old enough for its copyright to take expired. It is now legally in the Public Domain.

Original
author:

Delight proper name the original author of this work.

Lifetime:

Specify appointment of death, if applicative to public domain condition.
In many cases, nosotros demand to exist certain the author died before a sure yr, in many cases before 1926.

Original
publication:

Provide as much information as possible nigh the original time and identify of publication of this work. For print publications: provide total bibliographic data.

Date of
publication:

Provide date of first publication, and date of creation if different.

Immediate
source:

State exactly where you found this file.
For web sources: please provide a link to the html web page where the file tin exist plant ("http://... .html"), not a direct link to the image file itself ("http://... .jpg").
For print sources: provide total bibliographic information (author, title, publisher, year, page, etc.)

Public Domain
status:

This work is free of all copyrights considering:

	It was created and start published before 1926 and is therefore in the Public Domain in the US.
	It was offset published outside the US, and information technology was in the Public Domain in its country of origin past the "URAA date". For most countries, this means the writer died 70 years before one January 1996, i.eastward. before 1926. Please look upwardly the copyright rules for the specific country at [1].
	Information technology was starting time published in the The states earlier 1989, and its copyright expired because it was published without a copyright notice and/or without the necessary copyright registration. Please look upward the verbal rules at [2].
	Its copyright expired for some other reason. [Please explain below].

Explanation:

Please provide any show necessary to verify the public domain status.

This file is in the Public Domain for some other reason.
I tin can demonstrate that this work is legally in the Public Domain, i.e. nobody owns any copyrights on it. This may be for a diverseness of reasons, for instance considering it was created past the United states Federal Government, or considering it is as well simple to attract any copyright.

Public Domain means that nobody owns any copyrights on this work. Information technology does non hateful simply that it is freely viewable somewhere on the web or that it has been widely used by others.

This is non for images yous simply found somewhere on the spider web. Well-nigh images on the web are nether copyright and belong to somebody, even if you lot believe the owner won't intendance almost that copyright. If it is in the public domain, you lot must exist able to point to an bodily police force that makes it so. If you can't point to such a law but simply constitute this image somewhere, then please do not upload it.

Writer:

Please proper noun the original writer of this piece of work.

Source:

State exactly where you found this file.
For spider web sources: please provide a link to the html web page where the file can be establish ("http://... .html"), not a directly link to the image file itself ("http://... .jpg").
For print sources: provide full bibliographic information (author, title, publisher, twelvemonth, page, etc.)

Appointment of
creation:

Public Domain
status:

This work is gratuitous of all copyrights because:

	It was created past an agency of the United states Federal Authorities. This does non utilise to near U.s. land and local agencies, nor to governments of other countries!
	Information technology is an official governmental item, such equally a flag, state keepsake, banknote or postage, from a country where such items are exempt from copyright according to local law. This does not apply to all countries, nor does it usually use to all publications! (For example, it unremarkably doesn't apply to simple publicity photographs published on a governmental website.) Please look up the copyright rules for the specific country in question. If the country does not have an exemption dominion that applies to this detail, go on with the section for "non-free copyrighted works" below. Explanation: Add together any caption or evidence necessary to substantiate your statement above. Cite and provide a link to the relevant law if possible.
	Information technology is too simple to exist eligible for copyright. This typically applies only to graphics that consist solely of elementary geometric shapes and/or a few letters or words, or to items such as mathematical or chemical formulae. It may employ to some very simple logos that practise non incorporate complex pictorial elements. It never applies to photographs!
	Information technology is in the Public Domain for some other reason. Explanation:

This is a copyrighted, non-complimentary work, but I believe it is Fair Apply.
I have read the Wikipedia rules on Not-Gratuitous Content , and I am prepared to explicate how the utilize of this file will meet the criteria set out there.

Delight remember that you will need to demonstrate that:

The file will serve an important function in a particular commodity; (NFCC8)
It cannot be replaced by any other, free illustration that might yet be created; (NFCC1)
Its utilise does not negatively bear upon the commercial interests of its owner (NFCC2)
At that place volition not exist more than not-gratis material used than necessary. (NFCC3)

This file volition exist used in the following article:

Enter the name of exactly one Wikipedia article, without the [[...]] brackets and without the "http://en.wikipedia.org/..." URL code.
It has to be an actual commodity, not a talkpage, template, user page, etc.
If yous plan to use the file in more than one commodity, please proper noun only i of them hither. Then, subsequently uploading, open the image clarification page for editing and add your separate explanations for each boosted article manually.

Instance – commodity okay.

This article doesn't be!

The article Case could not be plant.

Please check the spelling, and brand sure you lot enter the name of an existing article in which you will include this file.

If this is an article you are simply planning to write, please write information technology first and upload the file later.

This is not an actual encyclopedia article!

The page Instance is not in the primary article namespace. Non-free files tin can only exist used in mainspace article pages, not on a user page, talk folio, template, etc.

Please upload this file only if information technology is going to be used in an bodily commodity.

If this folio is an article draft in your user infinite, we're lamentable, but nosotros must ask you to await until the page is set and has been moved into mainspace, and only upload the file afterward that.

This is a disambiguation folio!

The page Case is not a real article, but a disambiguation page pointing to a number of other pages.

Please check and enter the exact title of the actual target commodity you meant.

Non-free apply rationale

This paradigm is the object of give-and-take in an article.
This is a copyrighted artwork or photograph, and the prototype itself is the topic of discussion in the commodity. The give-and-take is near the photograph or painting as such, as a creative work, not just well-nigh the thing or person it shows.

Which of these options describes this item best?

Who created this work?
Author/owner:
Engagement:
Source:	State exactly where yous constitute this file. For web sources: please provide a link to the html web page where the file can be found ("http://... .html"), non a direct link to the epitome file itself ("http://... .jpg"). For print sources: provide full bibliographic data (author, title, publisher, year, folio, etc.)

Usage:
	The commodity as a whole is dedicated specifically to a word of this item photograph/painting. (It is non only about the person or affair shown in the picture show.)
	At that place is a substantial amount of encyclopedic discussion of this particular photograph/painting (not just about the person or thing shown in it) in this article. The analogy is specifically needed to back up the following point: If neither of these two statements applies, then please do not upload this image. This section is not for images used merely to illustrate an article about a person or matter, showing what that person or thing look like.

This is a depiction of a copyrighted iii-dimensional work or edifice, which is the object of give-and-take in an article.
This is a photograph or other kind of depiction of a copyrighted, three-dimensional creative work, such as a statue or work of architecture. The commodity contains a discussion of that work which requires analogy. The photograph as such is free, or was provided by the creator of the sculpture.

Which of these options describes this item all-time?

First describe who created the original piece of work depicted:
Creator:
Date:

Usage:
	The article every bit a whole is dedicated specifically to this piece of work.
	There is a substantial amount of encyclopedic discussion of this work in this article. The illustration is specifically needed to support the post-obit bespeak:

Now draw who created the image:
Author:
Date:
Source:	Country exactly where you institute this file. For web sources: delight provide a link to the html web page where the file can be found ("http://... .html"), not a directly link to the prototype file itself ("http://... .jpg"). For print sources: provide full bibliographic information (author, championship, publisher, twelvemonth, page, etc.)

Paradigm status
	The prototype was created and published past the same author who likewise holds the rights to the original object, and no culling depiction could be suitably created.
	The author of the image has released the photographic work nether a complimentary license, or it is in the public domain: Proper noun the license or draw the public domain condition, adding any necessary evidence to brand the licensing condition verifiable.

This is an excerpt from a copyrighted piece of work.
This is an excerpt from a copyrighted piece of work, e.g. a screenshot from a flick or Telly programme, a panel from a comic, or a sound sample from a song. Its presence is needed to support a piece of explicit critical word in an article related to that piece of work or its creator(s).

Which of these options describes this detail all-time?

Author:	(author / copyright owner of the original work)
Date of creation:
Source:	(where exactly did you become this file from?)
Please explicate what exactly in the article it is that you want to illustrate with this.
	Typically, the illustration must be used to support some specific upshot of discussion in the commodity. Please be concrete and specific. Don't just copy boilerplate statements from elsewhere. Land conspicuously, in your own words, what this item file will be doing in this particular commodity.
If necessary, please explain why this purpose cannot exist achieved through text lone.

This is the official cover art of a work.
This is the encompass or dustjacket of a book, the cover of a CD or video, the official release affiche of a movie, or a comparable item. It will be included as that work's primary ways of visual identification, at the top of the article about the volume, movie, etc. in question.
Note: If you plan to utilise it for any other purpose than this, please tick the box for "other non-free work" below.

Which of these options describes this particular all-time?

Author:	(writer / copyright owner of the original work)
Date of publication:
Source:	(where exactly did yous go this file from?)
This image will exist shown as a chief means of visual identification at the top of the commodity defended to the work in question. A standard fair use rationale volition be added that matches this type of employ. If you plan to utilise the file for whatever purpose other than this, delight do not utilise this section, but the one labelled "other blazon of non-free work" beneath.

This is a logo of an arrangement, company, brand, etc.
This is an official logo of an entity that is the subject of a Wikipedia article. It will be included every bit that entity's primary means of visual identification, at the top of the article in question.
Annotation: If you program to use information technology for whatever other purpose than this, please tick the box for "other non-gratuitous work" below.

Which of these options describes this particular best?

Source:	(where exactly did you lot get this file from?)
This image volition be shown as a primary means of visual identification at the top of the article dedicated to the entity in question. A standard fair use rationale volition be added that matches this type of use. If you lot plan to utilise the file for whatsoever purpose other than this, please exercise not use this section, but the i labelled "other type of non-free work" beneath.

This is a historical portrait of a person no longer alive.
This is a historical photograph or other depiction of a person who is no longer live. It will be used equally the principal means of visual identification of that person in the article near them.

Deceased since:	(This type of file can typically only be used with people who are no longer alive.)
Author:	(Who made this image?)
Original publication:	(Where, when and how was this image first published?)
Appointment of publication:
Source:	(Where exactly did y'all get this file from?)
This image will be shown as a chief means of visual identification at the top of the article dedicated to the person in question. A standard fair use rationale will exist added that matches this type of apply. If you plan to utilise the file for any purpose other than this, please do not use this section, but the 1 labelled "other type of not-gratuitous work" beneath.
Delight explain why a free alternative to this paradigm cannot exist found.
	For subjects who died recently: have you fabricated a reasonable attempt to find people who might possess photographs of this person and might exist willing to release ane? For subjects who lived in the early-to-mid 20th century: take you lot considered if there might be an older photograph that has fallen in the public domain?
Please explain why you are confident that our utilize of the file volition non harm any commercial opportunities of its owner.
	We will typically not use a file if its owner has a potential commercial interest in its utilise, and if our use of information technology would compete with its original market office.

This is some other kind of non-costless work that I believe is legitimate Off-white Use.
This is a copyrighted work whose use does not autumn into whatsoever of the classes to a higher place. I have read the Wikipedia rules on Non-free content, and I volition explain how this file meets all of the criteria gear up out there.

Which of these options describes this particular best?

Author:	(Who made this epitome?)
Original publication:	(Where, when and how was this paradigm get-go published?)
Date of publication:
Source:	(Where exactly did yous get this file from?)
Delight explain what exact purpose this file will serve in the article.
	Please exist concrete and specific. Don't only copy average statements from elsewhere. State conspicuously, in your own words, what this particular file volition be doing in this particular article. Your explanation must arrive clear why the article would be significantly worse off without this file.
Please explicate why this purpose could not be served by text alone.

Please explain why this purpose could not be served with an alternative, free illustration that could notwithstanding be constitute or created.
	For a file to be deemed replaceable, information technology is non necessary that a suitable replacement already exists. Fifty-fifty if it is merely possible that a replacement could be created, we will not use the not-free file.
Please explicate why you are confident that our use of the file will not harm any commercial opportunities of its possessor.
	We volition typically not employ a file if its possessor has a potential commercial interest in its use, and if our utilize of it would compete with its original market role.

Remember that the utilize of not-gratis files must exist minimal. This can mean several things: Don't use more than files per article/topic than necessary Don't use the same file in more manufactures than necessary Don't use larger excerpts of a single piece of work than necessary Don't utilize images of higher resolution than necessary In view of this, please explain how the utilise of this file will be minimal.

Special source and license weather condition (optional)

Any further relevant information about this file?

Edit summary:

A brief clarification of why you lot are overwriting this file. This will not exist saved on the description folio, just volition exist shown in its edit history.

Yes, I desire this file to be immediately bachelor in all Wikimedia projects, in all languages. I will upload information technology on the Wikimedia Commons.
Clicking this button will redirect you to a page on Commons. This will only work if y'all are already logged in there, which is probable the example if you have a unified account. Check here to see if you are logged in.

No, I want to upload this file locally.
This way it tin can be used only on the English language Wikipedia. Nosotros urge you to upload information technology to the Commons unless there is a very good reason for it to stay local. Frequently such local files are copied to the Commons for use elsewhere and deleted locally, requiring extra work for other volunteers. If you do not want your file to be copied to Commons and deleted locally, consider adding the {{Keep local}} tag.

Reset this form and start over.

This file doesn't fit either of the categories above.
This file doesn't seem to fall into either of the classes to a higher place, or I am non certain what its condition is. I institute this file somewhere, merely I don't really know who made it or who owns it.

Well, we're very lamentable, but if you're non certain about this file's copyright status, or if it doesn't fit into whatever of the groups higher up, then:

Please don't upload it.

Really, please don't. Even if y'all think it would make for a smashing addition to an commodity. We really take these copyright rules very seriously on Wikipedia. Annotation that media is assumed to be fully-copyrighted unless shown otherwise; the burden is on the uploader.

In detail, please don't upload:

any file you just found on some website, without knowing who its writer or copyright owner is.
any file you found somewhere, even if you lot accept good reason to believe it has a copyright owner who would not mind us using it, just you don't accept an explicit licensing argument from them.
whatsoever file that was released for publicity purposes by its owners but doesn't accept a fully-free license for free re-use for all purposes.
any file credited to a commercial epitome agency, such as Reuters, AP or Getty Images. Such files commonly cannot be used even under the "Off-white Use" rules, except in rare cases.
any file that is licensed for use exclusively on Wikipedia, or is free except that the gratis license excludes commercial utilise.

If you are in whatsoever dubiety, please ask some experienced editors for communication before uploading. People will be happy to assist you at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you.